An Indian Cricket Paradox Resolved

Possibly the explanations for the choice usually are not precisely proper. However a paradox is certainly resolved now.

Rahul Dravid, the previous Indian cricket captain who was referred to as the wall for his stable anchoring, final performed a someday worldwide (ODI) in October, 2007. His defensive strategy was not thought-about to be appropriate for ODI cricket and so was axed.

However, the IPL (Indian Premier League) that got here into being in February 2008 made Rahul Dravid one of many 5 highest paid icons. IPL is twenty20 that means you could have solely twenty overs to construct an innings in a match. Naturally, that is alleged to be harder than ODIs the place you could have fifty overs. Now, if you’re unfit for 50 over match, how on earth might you be thought-about not solely match however match for an icon too for twenty20 cricket. A paradox was thus created.

After India’s debacle within the T20 world cup of 2009 there was steady speak about Rahul’s ‘expertise’ and ‘solidity’. Rahul is type of a participant whose dogged anchoring in constructing an innings by no means will get highlighted in so many wins of Crew India. Some dashers who get the momentum from him handle to win the person of the match awards. The Wall all the time stays deserted on the finish.

On August 16, 2009, Rahul Dravid makes it to the 15 of Crew India chosen for the ODI Tri-series in Sri Lanka and the Champions Trophy in South Africa, each scheduled for September, 2009 IPL Opening Ceremony.

Rahul is previous 36. Underneath his captaincy the Royal Challengers did miserably in IPL-1. Although in IPL-2 the identical crew labored wonders, Rahul was not the captain and his efficiency confirmed solely sporadic brilliancy. There have been two main errors within the T20 debacle; collection of unfit Virender Sehwag and considerably forcing Rohit Sarma into the position of an opener. Whereas Sehwag solely contributed to the crew’s low morale and by no means performed a match, Rohit was a string of abject failures. And that made the selectors search for ‘expertise’ and ‘solidity’.

A paradox is resolved certainly. However how paradoxical it seems to be within the last reckoning stays to be seen.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *